71years . Baptised as an infant. Catholic ancestors go back to Goa. Urban hermit. Discoverer of The Rational Premise and VC2 rational and irrational. Break for trads.Discovered late in life that with LG 16 visible we get the New Theology and with LG 16 invisible we return to the Scholastic theology on EENS etc.
March 17. St. Patrick. Baptised at St. Patrick's Cathedral. Studied at St. Patrick's School,Graduated from St. Patrick's College, Karachi. Irish missionaries!
Eldest son of Luke and Maggie Andrades.Completed semesters in theology , with exams and credit points, at the National Catholic Institute of Theology, Karachi.
Studied Philosophy at the University Pontificia Regina Apostoloum, Rome. Final semester left. Also attended corses in Theology and Latin.
Catholic lay man in Rome. Discoverer of Feeneyism versus Cushingism, the Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II, a breakthrough for the present Catholic Church.The sedevacantists reject the pope because of Vatican Council II irrational. When the Council is rational it supports Tradition. There is no reason for them to reject the Council or the pope. Even the SSPX can now accept Vatican Council II , rational, and meet the demand that they accept the Council. The Council is in harmony with Tradition. So they can ask for canonical recognition. They can also demand that Pope Leo XIV interpret Vatican Council II rationally, since this is ethical and that he also accept Tradition, as did Pope Leo XIII. The main line Catholic Church must now be traditional since the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms can only be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional.
O ARCEBISPO DE MILÃO E A FSSPX NÃO ESTAVAM PRESENTES NA REUNIÃO DE MILÃO: O CONCÍLIO VATICANO II É RACIONAL E CONSERVADOR
23/04/2025
O ARCEBISPO DE MILÃO E A FSSPX NÃO ESTAVAM PRESENTES NA REUNIÃO DE MILÃO: O CONCÍLIO VATICANO II É RACIONAL E CONSERVADOR
1. O Papa Leão XIII e a FSSPX estão em cisma com o Magistério do século XVI sobre o princípio extra ecclesiam nulla salus, sem exceções. O Concílio de Florença de 1442 também não mencionou nenhuma exceção para o extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
2. O Papa Leão XIII e a FSSPX estão em cisma com os tempos de Agostinho e Tomás de Aquino, sobre os Credos (Niceno, Atanásio e Apóstolos). Eles interpretam LG 16 como sendo um caso fisicamente visível.
3. O Papa Leão XIII e a FSSPX estão em cisma sobre os Catecismos. Há uma ruptura com a Tradição. No Catecismo do Papa Pio X, 29Q não é uma exceção para 24Q e 27Q para mim, como o é para eles. 4. Para o Papa Leão XIII e a FSSPX, as passagens em vermelho contradizem as passagens em azul, mas não para mim. As passagens em vermelho (AG7, LG 14 etc.) são casos hipotéticos e não exemplos explícitos de salvação fora da …Altro
23.04.2025
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT THERE AT THE MILAN MEETING : VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS CONSERVATIVE
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT …
SALVINI’S MILAN MEETING HAMPERED BY RATZINGER’S …
EL ARZOBISPO DE MILÁN Y LA FSSPX NO ESTUVIERON PRESENTES EN LA REUNIÓN DE MILÁN: LA JUSTICIA DEL CONCILIO VATICANO II ES CONSERVADORA
23/04/2025
EL ARZOBISPO DE MILÁN Y LA FSSPX NO ESTUVIERON PRESENTES EN LA REUNIÓN DE MILÁN: LA JUSTICIA DEL CONCILIO VATICANO II ES CONSERVADORA
1. El Papa León XIII y la FSSPX están en cisma con el Magisterio del siglo XVI sobre la doctrina de "extra ecclesiam nulla salus" (sin excepción alguna para la salvación de los enfermos en la iglesia). El Concilio de Florencia de 1442 tampoco mencionó excepciones para la doctrina de "extra ecclesiam nulla salus" (sin excepción alguna).
2. El Papa León XIII y la FSSPX están en cisma con la época de Agustín y Tomás de Aquino sobre los Credos (Niceno, Atanasio y Apóstoles). Interpretan LG 16 como un caso físicamente visible.
3. El Papa León XIII y la FSSPX están en cisma sobre los Catecismos. Existe una ruptura con la Tradición. En el Catecismo del Papa Pío X, el versículo 29Q no constituye una excepción para los versículos 24Q y 27Q, al igual que para ellos.
4. Para el Papa León XIII y la FSSPX, los pasajes en rojo contradicen los …Altro
Esto parece la introducción a un curso de cripto-teología para zombis: "El Concilio Vaticano II, racional y tradicional, apoya la fe y la moral tradicionales". ¡Y Leon IX y la FSSPX en una misma deriva herética!
23.04.2025
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT THERE AT THE MILAN MEETING : VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS CONSERVATIVE
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT …
SALVINI’S MILAN MEETING HAMPERED BY RATZINGER’S …
DER ERZBISCHOF VON MAILAND UND DIE FSSPX WAREN NICHT BEIM MAILANDER KONGRESS ANGESTELLT: DAS ZWEITE VATIKANISCHE KONZIL IST RATIONAL UND KONSERVATIV
23.04.2025
DER ERZBISCHOF VON MAILAND UND DIE FSSPX WAREN NICHT BEIM MAILANDER KONGRESS ANGESTELLT: DAS ZWEITE VATIKANISCHE KONZIL IST RATIONAL UND KONSERVATIV
1. Papst Leo und die FSSPX befinden sich in einem Schisma mit dem Lehramt des 16. Jahrhunderts in Bezug auf „extra ecclesiam nulla salus“ (außerhalb der Kirche gibt es kein Heil), ohne Ausnahmen. Auch das Konzil von Florenz 1442 erwähnte keine Ausnahmen für „extra ecclesiam nulla salus“ (außerhalb der Kirche).
2. Papst Leo und die FSSPX befinden sich in einem Schisma mit der Zeit Augustins und Thomas von Aquin in Bezug auf die Glaubensbekenntnisse (Nizäisches, Athanasisches und Apostolisches Glaubensbekenntnis). Sie interpretieren LG 16 als einen Fall von physischer Sichtbarkeit.
3. Papst Leo und die FSSPX befinden sich in einem Schisma in Bezug auf die Katechismen. Es besteht ein Bruch mit der Tradition. Im Katechismus von Papst Pius X. stellt 29Q für mich keine Ausnahme zu 24Q und 27Q dar, wie es für sie der Fall ist.
4. …Altro
Ist das KI?
Unfassbar, der Autor hat keine Ahnung, was ein Schisma ausmacht.
L'ARCIVESCOVO DI MILANO E LA FSSPX NON ERANO PRESENTI ALL'INCONTRO DI MILANO: IL CONCILIO VATICANO II È RAZIONALE E CONSERVATORE
23.04.2025
L'ARCIVESCOVO DI MILANO E LA FSSPX NON ERANO PRESENTI ALL'INCONTRO DI MILANO: IL CONCILIO VATICANO II È RAZIONALE E CONSERVATORE
1. Papa Leone e la FSSPX sono in scisma con il Magistero del XVI secolo sulla dottrina "extra ecclesiam nulla salus", senza eccezioni. Anche il Concilio di Firenze del 1442 non menzionò alcuna eccezione per gli extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
2. Papa Leone e la FSSPX sono in scisma con l'epoca di Agostino e Tommaso d'Aquino sui Credi (Niceno, Atanasio e Apostoli). Interpretano LG 16 come un caso fisicamente visibile.
3. Papa Leone e la FSSPX sono in scisma sui Catechismi. C'è una rottura con la Tradizione. Nel Catechismo di Papa Pio X, il 29Q non costituisce un'eccezione per il 24Q e il 27Q per me, come invece lo è per loro.
4. Per Papa Leone e la Fraternità Sacerdotale San Pio X “i passi in rosso” contraddicono “i passi in blu”, ma non per me. I passi in rosso (AG7, LG14 ecc.) sono casi ipotetici e non esempi espliciti di salvezza al di fuori della …Altro
23.04.2025
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT THERE AT THE MILAN MEETING : VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS CONSERVATIVE
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT …
SALVINI’S MILAN MEETING HAMPERED BY RATZINGER’S …
L'archevêque de Milan et la FSSPX étaient absents de la réunion de Milan : Concile Vatican II - La rationalité est conservatrice
23.04.2025
L'archevêque de Milan et la FSSPX étaient absents de la réunion de Milan : Concile Vatican II - La rationalité est conservatrice
1. Le pape Léon XIII et la FSSPX sont en schisme avec le Magistère du XVIe siècle sur le principe « extra ecclesiam nulla salus », sans exception. Le concile de Florence de 1442 n'a également mentionné aucune exception pour les personnes extérieures à l'Église.
2. Le pape Léon XIII et la FSSPX sont en schisme avec les époques d'Augustin et de Thomas d'Aquin concernant les Credos (Nicée, Athanase et Apôtres). Ils interprètent LG 16 comme un cas physiquement visible.
3. Le pape Léon XIII et la FSSPX sont en schisme sur les catéchismes. Il y a rupture avec la Tradition. Dans le Catéchisme de Pie X, la question 29Q ne constitue pas une exception pour les questions 24Q et 27Q, contrairement à ce qui se passe pour eux. 4. Pour le pape Léon XIII et la FSSPX, les passages en rouge contredisent ceux en bleu, mais ce n'est pas mon avis. Les passages …Altro
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT THERE AT THE MILAN MEETING : VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS CONSERVATIVE
23.04.2025
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT THERE AT THE MILAN MEETING : VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS CONSERVATIVE
1. Pope Leo and the SSPX are in schism with the Magisterium of the 16th century on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, with no exceptions. The Council of Florence 1442 also did not mention any exceptions for EENS.
2. Pope Leo and the SSPX are in schism with the times of Augustine and Aquinas, on the Creeds (Nicene, Athanasius and Apostles). They interpret LG 16 as being a physically visible case.
3. Pope Leo and the SSPX are in schism on the Catechisms. There is a rupture with Tradition. In the Catechism of Pope Pius X, 29Q is not an exception for 24Q and 27 Q for me as it is for them.
4. For Pope Leo and the SSPX ‘the passages in red’ contradict ‘the passages in blue’ but not for me. The passages in red (AG7, LG 14 etc) are hypothetical cases and not explicit examples of salvation outside the Church. So they do not contradict EENS and the blue orthodox passages …Altro
23.04.2025
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT THERE AT THE MILAN MEETING : VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS CONSERVATIVE
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT …
SALVINI’S MILAN MEETING HAMPERED BY RATZINGER’S …
SALVINI’S MILAN MEETING HAMPERED BY RATZINGER’S SECRET: NO BISHOP PARTICIPATED
22.04.2025
SALVINI’S MILAN MEETING HAMPERED BY RATZINGER’S SECRET: NO BISHOP PARTICIPATED
With Vatican Council II rational and traditional the mainline Catholic Church is conservative once again.
With Vatican Council II rational the Church is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church would be fundamentalist for the political Left.
Vatican Council II rational and ecclesiocentric was no known to the popes. This was part of Ratzinger’s Secret.
With LG 16 invisible, Ratzinger, Rahner, Balthazar, Congar, Lubac, Kung and Pope Paul VI were in schism when they chose LG 16 visible to interpret the Council.
Participants at the Milan meeting must appeal to Pope Leo to simply announce that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases only in 2026. The Council then supports conservative social values.
No Cardinal or Bishop participated in Matteo Salvini’s meeting in Milan the other day because …Altro
23.04.2025
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT THERE AT THE MILAN MEETING : VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL IS CONSERVATIVE
THE ARCHBISHOP OF MILAN AND THE SSPX WERE NOT …
SALVINI’S MILAN MEETING HAMPERED BY RATZINGER’S …
"Now with Vatican Council II irrational..."
---
Oh yes, "Vatican II" is irrational indeed and on the verge of blasphemy at its worst parts e.g. Gaudium et Spes 12 & 22.
Pius VI (judging similar conciliabulum in Pistoia, in Auctorem Fidei) says it was no ecumenical council at all. And I believe him.
WHEN THE SSPX SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS THE HERMENEUTIC OF DISCONTINUITY AND CARD. MULLER SAYS IT HAS A CONTINUITY THEY ARE VAGUE : WE CAN NOW BE SPECIFIC
21.04.2026
WHEN THE SSPX SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS THE HERMENEUTIC OF DISCONTINUITY AND CARD. MULLER SAYS IT HAS A CONTINUITY THEY ARE VAGUE : WE CAN NOW BE SPECIFIC
When we refer to the hermeneutic of continuity or discontinuity, it is important to refer to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with exceptions or without exceptions. Since if Lumen Gentium 8, 14, 16 etc refer to visible cases then there is a discontinuity, with the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442 etc, which did not mention any exceptions. But if LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to invisible cases there is a hermeneutic of continuity with EENS.
Similarly with reference to Tradition, we must ask, do we affirm an Athanasius Creed which has exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II or no exceptions mentioned in the Council-text.
So when the SSPX says Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of discontinuity and Cardinal Muller says it has one of continuity, this is vague. They must be specific. …Altro
SSPX INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY LIKE POPE FRANCIS IN EVANGELII GAUDIUM
18.04.2026
SSPX INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY LIKE POPE FRANCIS IN EVANGELII GAUDIUM
With the New Theology the SSPX are liberals on Ecumenism and Inter-Religious Dialogue, like the pope and the cardinals and bishops. Cushingism is liberalism and schism.
They cite Tradition but in Tradition there were no separation between state and Church. Presently Pope Leo is aligned with the leftist state.
The SSPX maintains the separation of Church and State, a leftist concept. Since they use the New Theology, created with the False Premise they have collegiality, with the liberals.
With the New Theology they are liberals on Ecumenism and Inter-Religious Dialogue, like the pope and the cardinals and bishops. Cushingism is liberalism and schism.
They cite Tradition but in Tradition there were no separation between state and Church. Presently Pope Leo is aligned with the leftist state.
They interpret Vatican Council II as does Pope Francis in Evangelii Gaudium(EG).
Evangelii Gaudium …Altro
WHO AM I TO WRITE ALL THIS? : A BREAKTHROUGH ON VATICAN COUNCIL II. UNPRECEDENTED
18.04.2026
WHO AM I TO WRITE ALL THIS? : A BREAKTHROUGH ON VATICAN COUNCIL II. UNPRECEDENTED
Who am I to write all this?
1. 1. I am the discoverer of a rational and irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
2. 2. There is a historical interpretation of Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Councils etc) rationally or irrationally, with Feeneyism or Cushingism.
3. 3.There is a magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church even if the pope, cardinals and bishops are irrational, non traditional, schismatic , non apostolic and non magisterial on certain issues.
4. 4.Discovered that in general Catholics with doctorates and master’s degrees in theology are irrational and schismatic and political-left.
5. 5.I have discovered that the books on Vatican Council II in general are obsolete and outdated with the false premise and liberal conclusion. The Council can only be interpreted rationally and non schismatically.
6. 6.Ad Gentes 7 says …Altro
CONSISTORY IN JUNE WILL ONCE AGAIN INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND NOT RATIONALLY
16.04.2026
CONSISTORY IN JUNE WILL ONCE AGAIN INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONALLY AND NOT RATIONALLY
Dignitais Humane, in Vatican Council II is traditional when you interpret it rationally. This was not known to John Courtney Murray, Hans Kung, Joseph Ratzinger and others who interpret the Council with schismatic Cushingism.
With Vatican Council II rational, there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Church so how can Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez justify Amoris Laetitia and Gaudium Evangelii.
Similarly the ecumenism, inter-religious dialogue and concept of salvation for the Jews in Gaudium Evangelii is not compatible with Vatican Council II interpreted only honestly.
Once again there will be a consistory of Pope Leo based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally, a fundamental flaw in the theology of Pope Francis in Evangelii Gaudium and Amoris Laeitia.
Why must Catholics interpret LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being explicit and not …Altro
Cushingite liberalism, of Pope Leo and the cardinals and bishops, is now irrational, schismatic and obsolete. It no more is an option : the mainline Church becomes traditionalist
15.04.2026
Cushingite liberalism, of Pope Leo and the cardinals and bishops, is now irrational, schismatic and obsolete. It no more is an option : the mainline Church becomes traditionalist
Archbishop Lefebvre and Fr. Leonard Feeney, traditionalists, did not mention Vatican Council II interpreted rationally, which would be aligned with the EENS of the Church Councils, with no exceptions. This is now a discovery in the Catholic Church.
The mainline Church becomes traditionalist, but not Cushingite traditionalists like the SSPX but Feeneyite traditionalists like the St. Benedict Center in Richmond, New Hampshire, USA.
The main line Catholic Church returns to Tradition, with Vatican Council II rational and is no more liberal.
Even though I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with no known exceptions, the real issue now in the Catholic Church, is Vatican Council II, having no exceptions for EENS. This is troublesome for the SSPX priests and laity at their St. Catherine of …Altro
WE CAN INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY OR IRRATIONALLY, WITH THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY OR RUPTURE, WE CAN CHOOSE : IT IS NO MORE EITHER-OR
15.04.2026
WE CAN INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY OR IRRATIONALLY, WITH THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY OR RUPTURE, WE CAN CHOOSE : IT IS NO MORE EITHER-OR
So the Society of St. Pius X can accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally and also Tradition. They are not opposed to each other.
The Ecclesia Dei communities and the sedevacantists are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally like Pope Leo, the cardinals and the bishops. They now have a rational and traditional choice. The irraional version produces the common schism.
We can interpret Vatican Council II rationally or irrationally, with the hermeneutic of continuity or rupture with Tradition. It is as simple as turning on a light switch. We can choose Tradition or schism.
When LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible and hypothetical cases only in 2026, this is the rational interpretation.
When LG 8 etc refer to visible and personally known people in 2026 this is the …Altro
FRENCH BISHOPS WANT THE LITURGY TO CONFORM TO VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL AND NOT RATIONAL
14.04.2026
FRENCH BISHOPS WANT THE LITURGY TO CONFORM TO VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL AND NOT RATIONAL
Canonically the mainline French bishops are in schism with Vatican Council II irrational and the New Missal, being Cushingite and also schismatic.
French bishops and Pope Leo did not protest against the hate directed against Carrie Prejean Boller who said Christ is King and lost her job with the U.S Government because of her Catholic faith.
Cardinal Jean-Marc Aveline of Marseille, president of the French bishops, told KTO on April 5, it was reported on Gloria TV that the liturgy must conform to Vatican Council II irrational. This is false. The liturgy must be aligned only with Vatican Council II rational. Vatican Council II rational is eclesiocentric and traditional.
Vatican Council II, with Ad Gentes 7 not contradicted by Lumen Gentium 16, is Feeneyite and traditionalist, like the French Catholic Church over the centuries. Today the French Catholic Church is Cushingite and schismatic …Altro
The real doctrinal problem today is with Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez who use the LG 16 visible heresy and the SSPX does not seem to know it
13.04.2026
The real doctrinal problem today is with Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez who use the LG 16 visible heresy and the SSPX does not seem to know it.
Roberto dei Mattei’s books and videos are put out with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. He uses the New Theology which has come from Rahner and Ratzinger in 1965 with the LG 16 visible heresy. Rahner and Ratzinger were never excommunicated.
With LG 16 invisible Roberto de Mattei would become a Feeneyite traditionalist. He avoids this label to remain politically correct with the Left.
Why is he allowed to receive the Eucharist at Holy Mass at the FSSP church in Rome?
1. He interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and so there are explicit exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesia nulla salus (EENS). He does not affirm an EENS with no exceptions.
I interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so there are no explicit exceptions for the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442. LG 8, 14, 16 etc refer to hypothetical and …Altro
@Strong and Steadfast Engage!
POPE LEO INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II SCHISMATICALLY WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE HERESY : CHANGES THE CREEDS AT HOLY MASS
12.04.2026
POPE LEO INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II SCHISMATICALLY WITH THE LG 16 VISIBLE HERESY : CHANGES THE CREEDS AT HOLY MASS
Pope Francis did not tell Fr. Stefano Mannelli F.I that Vatican Council II supports Tradition.Pope Leo does not tell the SSPX that Cardinal Fernandez is in schism.
A nihil obstat and imprimatur are needed for Karl Rahner's books but also that of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger published by Igantius Press.
Why go for Pope Leo’s Holy Mass when he has changed the understanding of the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms and no cardinal, bishop or priest can defend him?
Any journalist an confirm that with the LG 16 visible mistake, Pope Leo’s understanding of the Athanasius, Nicene and Apostles Creed is not the same as it was for the saints Augustine and Aquinas. There is also a rupture with the dogma extra cclesiam nulla salus of the Magisterium of the 16th century, for example. There is a schismatic break with the Magisterium of the Middle Ages.
On abortion, Pope Leo has …Altro
Why don't you stop worshipping "Twitter"?
Apparently, "Twitter" is your Magisterium.
HOW CAN POPE LEO BE THE POPE ?
11. 04.2026
HOW CAN POPE LEO BE THE POPE ?
Pope Leo and Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez are in schism with LG 16 visible.With LG 16 invisible they become Feeneyite traditionalists.
In schism they continue to penalize the St. Benedict Center (SBC) in New Hampshire, USA. The Feeneyite traditionalists there interpret Vatican Council II with LG 16 invisible. They affirm all the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, also rationally.
In schism, Fernandez declared the traditionalist Archbishop Vigano to be in schism.Vigano will not accept Vatican Council II interpreted schismatically like Pope Francis and Cardinal Fernandez.
While in schism Pope Leo and Cardinal Fernandez threaten the SSPX with a schism-charge. The SSPX rejects the schismatic and non traditional conclusion of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. The SSPX affirms Tradition without Vatican Council II irrational. They will ordain new bishops who will do the same. In China the new bishops accept Vatican Council II interpreted …Altro
CARDINAL RATZINGER DID NOT ALLOW THE SSPX TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY, TRADITIONALLY AND SO CANONICALLY : HE WAS IN DOCTRINAL SCHISM WITH ‘ LG 16 VISIBLE’
09.04.2026
CARDINAL RATZINGER DID NOT ALLOW THE SSPX TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY, TRADITIONALLY AND SO CANONICALLY : HE WAS IN DOCTRINAL SCHISM WITH ‘ LG 16 VISIBLE’
Cardinal Ratzinger did not allow the SSPX to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, traditionally and so canonically: he was in doctrinal schism with ‘LG 16 visible’.
Ratzinger kept it a secret. He was in schism with the LG 16-visible premise. He allowed the traditionalist Fr. Leonard Feeney in Boston to remain excommunicated in 1965.He did not announce that Feeney was correct there were no visible cases of the baptism of desire. He kept silent.
Then he excommunicated the Cushingite traditionalist Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops. They had rejected the non traditional conclusion of Vatican Council II. The Council emerged non traditional when it was interpreted with the LG 16 visible premise of Karl Rahner. This error of Rahner is there in his book The Christian of the Future.
Pope Benedict …Altro
CARDINALS FERNANDEZ, LADARIA, O’MALLEY, BISHOP LIBASCI AND FR. LAIRE LIKE CARDINAL RATZINGER, INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY AND SCHISMATICALLY.
08.04.2026
CARDINALS FERNANDEZ, LADARIA, O’MALLEY, BISHOP LIBASCI AND FR. LAIRE LIKE CARDINAL RATZINGER, INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY AND SCHISMATICALLY.
The popes from Pius XII to Leo XIV have been in schism on a particular point. With Vatican Council II and the Catechism interpreted rationally they become Feeneyite traditionalists overnight.This is a secret they keep hidden.
Cardinals Burke, Sarah, and Bishop Athanasius Schneidrer would also become Feeneyite traditionalists when Ad Gentes 7 is aligned with EENS and LG 16 is not an explicit exception for AG 7 or EENS.
In 1965 when the excommunication of Fr.Leonard Feneey was still not lifted, Fr. Joseph Ratzinger did not announce that Lumen Gentium 16 in Vatican Council II was not an explicit exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Florence . The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop’ of Boston confused implicit cases of the baptism of desire as being explicit examples of …Altro
CARD.FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM ON VATICAN COUNCIL II LIKE CARDINAL RATZINGER : CANONICALLY HE CANNOT EXCOMMUNICATE THE SSPX
07.04.2026
CARD.FERNANDEZ IS IN SCHISM ON VATICAN COUNCIL II LIKE CARDINAL RATZINGER : CANONICALLY HE CANNOT EXCOMMUNICATE THE SSPX
I affirm Ad Gentes 7 with LG 16 not being an exception for AG 7. This is the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II. Cardinal Ratzinger would affirm LG 16 as an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Pius IX.There was a rupture with the past. This was schism. He was automatically excommunicated?
Schism is a mortal sin of faith and he had changed the interpretation of the Creeds, with alleged visible LG 16.
For Cardinal Ratzinger, Lumen Gentium 16, being saved in invincible ignorance outside the Catholic Church, was a visible case. For me it is invisible.
For him LG 16 was a visible example of salvation outside the Catholic Church and an explicit exception for the dogma EENS of the Council of Florence 1442, which did not mention any exceptions. For me LG 16 is invisible and so does not contradict …Altro